| Scheme Name | Launch Date | AUM (Crore) | Expense Ratio (%) | 1-Yr Return (%) | 3-Yrs Return (%) | 5-Yrs Return (%) | 10-Yrs Return (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi-Cap Fund-Regular Growth | 07-05-2021 | 7244.44 | 2.00 | 2.16 | 11.73 | 9.67 | - |
| ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | 01-10-1994 | 18717.26 | 1.76 | 0.59 | 12.64 | 11.59 | 13.08 |
| Kotak MultiCap Fund-Regular Plan-Growth | 03-09-2021 | 30274.36 | 1.80 | -1.62 | 13.78 | 14.11 | - |
| Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund - Regular Plan - Growth | 05-05-2017 | 7457.36 | 2.16 | 6.16 | 14.32 | 11.81 | - |
| Nippon India Multi Cap Fund-Growth Plan-Growth Option | 25-03-2005 | 53766.63 | 1.62 | -5.14 | 10.90 | 13.65 | 14.39 |
"Consistency" here generally means a scheme has stayed in the top quartile of its category, or comfortably above the category average, across multiple periods and market phases - rather than having produced one standout year that pulls up its overall average.
Consistency matters more than a single high return for long-term holders because a fund that performs reliably doesn't depend on one particular kind of market (a sharp rally, say) to look good - it has shown it can hold up reasonably well across different conditions, which is closer to what an investor actually experiences over a multi-year holding period.
That said, past consistency is a description of history, not a guarantee - a change in fund manager, investment mandate, or a shift in the fund's size can alter a scheme's behaviour going forward. Use this list as one input alongside rolling returns and category comparisons, not as a standalone final answer.
